ComparisonComparisonKilz TB-91 and Sherwin-Williams SW 6617, ΔE 5.8 apart
Kilz Angelic Pink (TB-91) and Sherwin-Williams Blushing (SW 6617) measure a delta-E of 5.8 apart. Angelic Pink is 9.2 LRV points lighter, which is the difference you notice first. Blushing holds more color, chroma 13.9 against 10.9, so it grays out less in dim light. These read as related but distinct. Sample both before committing. If you need the Blushing depth in Kilz's line, start from its LRV of 67.8 rather than matching by name.
Kilz Angelic Pink and Sherwin-Williams Blushing are delta-E 5.8 apart - a difference that shows up on a wall, not just side by side on two chips.
The measured color distance between Kilz Angelic Pink and Sherwin-Williams Blushing is delta-E 5.8.
Kilz Angelic Pink is lighter than Sherwin-Williams Blushing by 9.2 points of light reflectance (LRV).
Sherwin-Williams Blushing carries more color than Kilz Angelic Pink - a higher chroma value means a more intense, less grey color.
| Angelic Pink | Blushing | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Kilz | Sherwin-Williams |
| Code | TB-91 | SW 6617 |
| Hex | #F6E0D2 | #F0D1C3 |
| Light reflectance | 77.0 | 67.8 |
| Undertone | orange undertone | orange undertone |
| Chroma | 10.9 | 13.9 |
| Hue angle | 61.1° | 51.6° |
| Color family | tan | tan |